← The collection

All-Pay Auction.

Choose a bid for a twelve-unit prize when every participant pays regardless of winning.

Interactive experimentintuitiveField note ·
INTERACTIVE EXPERIMENT / M22

All-Pay Auction

Choose a bid for a twelve-unit prize when every participant pays regardless of winning.

PLAY & EXPLAIN

Prize value: 12. Your rival bids uniformly from integers 1–10. Highest bid wins; a tie splits the prize. Everyone pays their bid, including the loser.

015

A fixed uniform bot and split-prize ties are assumed. This is not an equilibrium prediction for real contests.

THE SHORT VERSION

All-Pay Auction, explained.

An all-pay auction requires every bidder to pay their bid while only the winner receives the prize, subject to stated tie rules.

01 / THE MECHANISM

Why it happens

A rival bids uniformly over integers one through ten. The highest bid wins a prize worth twelve; ties split it. The board reports actual net payoff and the exact average across the ten possible rival bids.

An all-pay auction requires every bidder to pay their bid while only the winner receives the prize, subject to stated tie rules.

Read the result

Net payoff subtracts your bid whether you win, tie or lose. The ten-case average describes only the declared uniform rival.

02 / FOLLOW IT THROUGH

A worked example

Buy a chance at a twelve-unit prize

  1. Select an integer bid while the rival’s one-through-ten bid remains hidden.

  2. Submit once and subtract the full bid from either twelve, six on a tie, or zero on a loss.

  3. Compare that realised payoff with the exact ten-rival average without interpreting one win as evidence of a profitable strategy.

OPTIONAL DEEPER DETAILGo deeper: inside the model

Inside this model

A rival bids uniformly over integers one through ten. The highest bid wins a prize worth twelve; ties split it. The board reports actual net payoff and the exact average across the ten possible rival bids.

03 / BEYOND THE EXPERIMENT

Where this idea is useful

A practical use

Distinguish contests where effort is irrecoverable from auctions in which only the winner pays.

CHECK YOUR INTUITION

A common misconception

THE TEMPTING CONCLUSION

“Only the winning bidder pays in every auction.”

THE MORE USEFUL DISTINCTION

All-pay rules explicitly charge everyone. This difference changes expected costs and can make aggressive losing effort expensive.

What this explanation leaves out

  • A fixed uniform bot and split-prize ties are assumed. This is not an equilibrium prediction for real contests.
ONE MORE QUESTION

Does the game solve a strategic all-pay equilibrium?

No. It compares choices against a fixed uniform bot; changing the rival strategy or tie rule would change the payoff calculation.

TAKE THE IDEA WITH YOU

Which effort costs remain even when you do not receive the prize?

Associated thinkers

Associated withVijay Krishna ↗

Associations marked provisional are awaiting source review.

Further reading

Explore the original research or the teaching reference behind this experiment.