← The collection

Minimax Regret.

Choose a venue by protecting the worst payoff or limiting hindsight shortfall.

Interactive experimentintuitiveField note ·
Preparing the experiment…
THE SHORT VERSION

Minimax Regret, explained.

Minimax regret chooses an action whose largest opportunity loss across possible states is smallest, where loss is measured relative to the best action in each state.

01 / THE MECHANISM

Why it happens

Café pays 4 in sun and rain; Park pays 10 or 0; Hall pays 7 or 3. Worst payoffs are 4,0,3; worst regrets are 6,4,3. Choose a criterion, commit a venue and inspect both weather outcomes without assigning probabilities.

Minimax regret chooses an action whose largest opportunity loss across possible states is smallest, where loss is measured relative to the best action in each state.

Read the result

Worst payoff and worst regret have different reference points. Inspect the state-specific best outcome before treating a shortfall as regret.

02 / FOLLOW IT THROUGH

A worked example

A venue under unknown weather probabilities

  1. Compare Café's payoffs four and four with Park's ten and zero and Hall's seven and three.

  2. Maximin chooses Café with worst payoff four; minimax regret chooses Hall with worst shortfall three relative to each weather state's best venue.

  3. Commit a venue and inspect both weather outcomes to see how the two criteria evaluate the same payoff table.

OPTIONAL DEEPER DETAILGo deeper: inside the model

Inside this model

Café pays 4 in sun and rain; Park pays 10 or 0; Hall pays 7 or 3. Worst payoffs are 4,0,3; worst regrets are 6,4,3. Choose a criterion, commit a venue and inspect both weather outcomes without assigning probabilities.

03 / BEYOND THE EXPERIMENT

Where this idea is useful

A practical use

A decision with unknown probabilities can be compared under different conservative rules rather than an unstated expected-value calculation.

CHECK YOUR INTUITION

A common misconception

THE TEMPTING CONCLUSION

“The most conservative rule must recommend the same action every time.”

THE MORE USEFUL DISTINCTION

Conservatism can mean protecting an absolute floor or limiting missed opportunity. Those are different judgments and can produce different recommendations.

What this explanation leaves out

  • Payoffs and states are authored, no probabilities are implied, and numerical opportunity loss is not emotional regret. The criteria embody different judgments rather than one universally correct decision rule.
ONE MORE QUESTION

Does a high opportunity-loss number measure how upset I should feel?

No. Regret is a technical payoff comparison here. It does not measure emotional regret or prescribe a psychological response to the outcome.

TAKE THE IDEA WITH YOU

Are you trying to protect a minimum result or avoid falling far behind the best action in hindsight?

Associated thinkers

Associated withLeonard Savage ↗

Associations marked provisional are awaiting source review.

Further reading

Explore the original research or the teaching reference behind this experiment.