← The collection

Mutation–Selection Balance.

Explore why selection need not erase a deleterious recessive allele.

Interactive experimentintuitiveField note ·
Preparing the experiment…
THE SHORT VERSION

Mutation–Selection Balance, explained.

Mutation–selection balance is a state where new copies introduced by mutation offset copies removed by selection.

01 / THE MECHANISM

Why it happens

Recessive aa fitness is 1−s while AA and Aa fitness is one. Selection changes q to q(1−sq)/(1−sq²), then forward mutation gives q′=qSelected+μ(1−qSelected). Start q=0.5 and compare the recurrence with the rare-allele approximation √(μ/s).

Mutation–selection balance is a state where new copies introduced by mutation offset copies removed by selection.

Read the result

Compare current q with the approximate reference over many generations. The persistent allele is not evidence that selection stopped operating.

02 / FOLLOW IT THROUGH

A worked example

A recessive allele replenished by mutation

  1. Leave mutation at 0.005 and the recessive fitness loss at 0.5, giving an approximate balance of ten percent.

  2. Run successive hundred-generation blocks from q equal to one half and observe how selection and mutation approach a balance.

  3. Increase mutation and restart. More replenishment raises the reference balance while the selection rule remains unchanged.

OPTIONAL DEEPER DETAILGo deeper: inside the model

Inside this model

Recessive aa fitness is 1−s while AA and Aa fitness is one. Selection changes q to q(1−sq)/(1−sq²), then forward mutation gives q′=qSelected+μ(1−qSelected). Start q=0.5 and compare the recurrence with the rare-allele approximation √(μ/s).

03 / BEYOND THE EXPERIMENT

Where this idea is useful

A practical use

An allele can remain present because heterozygotes carry it and recurrent mutation supplies new copies.

CHECK YOUR INTUITION

A common misconception

THE TEMPTING CONCLUSION

“Selection must eventually remove every harmful allele.”

THE MORE USEFUL DISTINCTION

New mutation can replenish an allele, and recessive copies can persist in heterozygotes. A balance need not mean the allele is beneficial.

What this explanation leaves out

  • The model assumes random mating, an infinite population, no back mutation, no migration and complete recessivity. The square-root approximation is not exact at all parameter values or after a finite run; no clinical inference is intended.
ONE MORE QUESTION

Is the square-root line the exact equilibrium?

It is a rare-allele approximation under restrictive assumptions. The recurrence is the actual model being iterated, and a finite run may not reach equilibrium.

TAKE THE IDEA WITH YOU

What replenishes the quantity being removed in the system you are studying?

Associated thinkers

Associated withJ. B. S. Haldane ↗

Associations marked provisional are awaiting source review.

Further reading

Explore the original research or the teaching reference behind this experiment.