← The collection

Put–Call Parity.

Compare two portfolios with identical terminal payoffs but adjustable quoted costs.

Interactive experimentintuitiveField note ·
INTERACTIVE EXPERIMENT / P51

Put–Call Parity

Compare two portfolios with identical terminal payoffs but adjustable quoted costs.

TEST THE MECHANISM

Compare a European call plus a bond paying strike 100 with a European put plus one share. Initial stock is 100, maturity one year and risk-free annual rate 5%; dividends and frictions are absent.

Teaching market quotes
0200
Replicating portfolios
PortfolioInitial costTerminal payoff
Call + strike bond108.00100.00
Put + share108.00100.00
Initial cost difference A − B
0.00
Terminal payoff difference A − B
0.00
Put–call parity
Satisfied

Changing the terminal stock price preserves equal payoffs. A cost mismatch suggests an ideal buy-cheaper/sell-dearer replication argument, not an executable trade after borrowing constraints, spreads or option exercise differences.

European exercise, no dividends, a five-percent risk-free rate and frictionless financing are assumed. Actual borrowing, spreads and contract features can prevent execution of an ideal arbitrage.

THE SHORT VERSION

Put–Call Parity, explained.

Put–call parity is a no-arbitrage relation between European put and call prices, the underlying asset and the present value of the strike under stated assumptions.

01 / THE MECHANISM

Why it happens

A call plus a bond paying strike one hundred matches a put plus a share at every selected terminal stock price. Market-quote presets either satisfy equality or overprice one option by three.

Put–call parity is a no-arbitrage relation between European put and call prices, the underlying asset and the present value of the strike under stated assumptions.

Read the result

Initial cost and terminal payoff belong to different dates. The two portfolios’ equal terminal payoffs persist across the selected stock-price scenarios.

02 / FOLLOW IT THROUGH

A worked example

Check replication before discussing market direction

  1. Keep matched quotes and compare call-plus-bond cost with put-plus-share cost.

  2. Move terminal stock price below and above strike one hundred, checking equal payoffs in both regions.

  3. Choose the overpriced-call preset and observe initial cost differ by three while terminal payoff difference remains zero.

OPTIONAL DEEPER DETAILGo deeper: inside the model

Inside this model

A call plus a bond paying strike one hundred matches a put plus a share at every selected terminal stock price. Market-quote presets either satisfy equality or overprice one option by three.

03 / BEYOND THE EXPERIMENT

Where this idea is useful

A practical use

Use payoff replication to distinguish an inconsistent price relationship from a forecast about the underlying asset.

CHECK YOUR INTUITION

A common misconception

THE TEMPTING CONCLUSION

“An option price inconsistency is simply a forecast that the stock will rise.”

THE MORE USEFUL DISTINCTION

Put–call parity compares replicating payoffs under no-arbitrage assumptions. It does not require a directional prediction about the stock.

What this explanation leaves out

  • European exercise, no dividends, a five-percent risk-free rate and frictionless financing are assumed. Actual borrowing, spreads and contract features can prevent execution of an ideal arbitrage.
ONE MORE QUESTION

Can I execute the displayed difference as a real trade?

The benchmark omits spreads, borrowing restrictions, exercise features and dividends, so a model mismatch alone is not an execution plan.

TAKE THE IDEA WITH YOU

Do the portfolios match in every relevant terminal state, not just the scenario you prefer?

Associated thinkers

Associated withHans Stoll ↗

Associations marked provisional are awaiting source review.

Further reading

Explore the original research or the teaching reference behind this experiment.