← The collection

Tax Incidence.

Introduce a per-unit tax and separate the buyer’s price from the seller’s receipt.

Interactive experimentintuitiveField note ·
INTERACTIVE EXPERIMENT / P48

Tax Incidence

Introduce a per-unit tax and separate the buyer’s price from the seller’s receipt.

TEST THE MECHANISM

A competitive teaching market has demand P = 100−Q and supply P = 2Q. Add a per-unit tax and distinguish the buyer’s price from the seller’s net receipt.

050
Price00752515050Quantity →
DemandSupply including tax
Quantity traded
33.33
Buyer price
66.67
Seller net price
66.67
Buyer burden per unit
-0.00
Seller burden per unit
0.00
Tax revenue
0.00

Here buyers bear one-third and sellers two-thirds of the wedge because of the specified slopes. Statutory remittance does not determine economic incidence. Externalities, evasion, market power and distribution beyond these curves are omitted.

The stated linear competitive curves omit evasion, externalities, market power and heterogeneity. Incidence fractions are specific to these slopes.

THE SHORT VERSION

Tax Incidence, explained.

Tax incidence describes how a tax changes economic burdens rather than merely who formally remits the payment.

01 / THE MECHANISM

Why it happens

Demand is P=100−Q and supply P=2Q. A tax t creates a buyer–seller price wedge and quantity (100−t)/3; buyers bear t/3 and sellers 2t/3 relative to the untaxed equilibrium.

Tax incidence describes how a tax changes economic burdens rather than merely who formally remits the payment.

Read the result

Buyer price and seller net price differ by the tax wedge. Formal remittance and economic burden are not treated as the same quantity.

02 / FOLLOW IT THROUGH

A worked example

Split a thirty-unit tax under known slopes

  1. Start from the untaxed equilibrium quantity one hundred divided by three.

  2. Set the tax to thirty and inspect quantity seventy divided by three.

  3. Compare the buyer burden ten and seller burden twenty, which follow the specified supply and demand slopes.

OPTIONAL DEEPER DETAILGo deeper: inside the model

Inside this model

Demand is P=100−Q and supply P=2Q. A tax t creates a buyer–seller price wedge and quantity (100−t)/3; buyers bear t/3 and sellers 2t/3 relative to the untaxed equilibrium.

03 / BEYOND THE EXPERIMENT

Where this idea is useful

A practical use

Separate legal remittance from changes in prices and net receipts when evaluating a transaction tax.

CHECK YOUR INTUITION

A common misconception

THE TEMPTING CONCLUSION

“The party who remits the tax necessarily bears its whole economic cost.”

THE MORE USEFUL DISTINCTION

Price adjustment can distribute the burden across both sides of a market, depending on responsiveness and the market structure.

What this explanation leaves out

  • The stated linear competitive curves omit evasion, externalities, market power and heterogeneity. Incidence fractions are specific to these slopes.
ONE MORE QUESTION

Are one-third and two-thirds universal incidence shares?

No. They come from this particular linear demand slope minus one and supply slope two, not a general tax rule.

TAKE THE IDEA WITH YOU

Which behavioural responsiveness determines the burden beyond the legal payment instruction?

Associated thinkers

Associated withAlfred Marshall ↗

Associations marked provisional are awaiting source review.

Further reading

Explore the original research or the teaching reference behind this experiment.